Nowadays young people are admiring media and sports stars, even though they do not set a good example. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In this modern era, adolescents become admire by media and sports personalities, yet they do not show superior picture. It seems to me as negative development and reasons are explained in the paragraphs below.
To begin with, there are numerous reasons which shows the bad impact of this criteria. The first and foremost reason behind this notion is that youngsters make the famous personalities as their idols. They do same things in the manner of their idol, which becomes hilarious to their lives and their future. For instance, many sport stars use the consumption of deleterious drugs to boost their ability to make their work in a great manner. Due to the consumption of narcotize, their hormones become more active and they feel more strong to show their best for publicity. However, teenagers who follow them, also try to become copy of their idol. As a result, they become stuck in the addiction of drugs. Due to which, some of them end their life, this leads to increase in mortality rate and shows negative development.
In addition, through media, there are plenty of crime reports, which are come in front of public and young people. In this manner, media shows whole details of these reports and most of the youngsters follow them and try to do in the same manner. For instance, in contemporary settings, most of the rape cases are came in front from small towns, especially of India. These crime reports are becoming hot topic in present duration on all social sites and so on. Due to this, many teenagers become aware of that manner in which these types of shit crimes done. As a result, the crime rates become at peak especially in rape and molestation cases. Therefore, this becomes negative progress of a nation.
To conclude, I personally consider that media and sports personalities are negative picture for adolescents in numerous manners due to which, this leads to negative progression of a nation to.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s reasons which shows the bad impact of this criteria. The first and foremost reason...
^^^^
Line 2, column 422, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a great manner" with adverb for "great"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... boost their ability to make their work in a great manner. Due to the consumption of narcotize, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...ry settings, most of the rape cases are came in front from small towns, especially o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that media and sports personalities are negative picture for adolescents in nume...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88109756098 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58090208014 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521341463415 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1695879003 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9444444444 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169980432635 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590982129923 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568993126415 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136492812942 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665100965383 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.