the chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The given bar chart and table illustrates the yearly earnings of 2015 and 2016 from the export sector of a country in multitude of categories such as engineered goods, textiles, ornaments (gems and jewellery) , petroleum and agricultural products in addition to change of percentage in export values during the same period of time. Bar chart values are represented in billion dollars.
Overall, the biggest contributor of export earnings is the petroleum products followed by engineered goods in 2015 and during 2016 engineered goods rose significantly (8.5%) to the point of being the biggest contributor as well. In 2015 textiles industry were the least contributor, whereas on the following year it shared the same trend (15.24%) of engineered goods and became almost equal to the second least commodity agricultural products.
In the year 2015, pertroleum products were the top exports by the country accounting to a little more than 60 billion dollars, secondly engineered goods with 58 billion dollars. Followed by Ornamental goods and agricultural products with approximately 42 and 31 billion dollars respectively, however the least being the textiles which account for more than a quarter million.
In 2016, every commodity were increased in the percentage values and it was evidently seen in textiles and engineered goods. But pertoleum and agricultural products had negligible rise 3% and 0.81% each. On the contrary agricultural products are the singular commodity that has dip in the percentage values (5.4%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., textiles, ornaments gems and jewellery , petroleum and agricultural products in ...
^^
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...entage in export values during the same period of time. Bar chart values are represented in bi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...me. Bar chart values are represented in billion dollars. Overall, the biggest contri...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agricultural products with approximately 42 and 31 billion dollars respectively, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, well, whereas, in addition, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45338983051 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94952101154 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521186440678 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.1629971031 43.030603864 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2474141382 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103700392737 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924413132639 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15964167769 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101640693908 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.