the chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying habits in five cities in Australia
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where possible
The bar chart illustrates the outcomes of a survey conducted among people of Australia in five cities (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, Hobart), survery is based on the people buying and drinking habit among fresh coffee, instant coffee and going to cafe for coffee or tea in a period of 4 weeks.
Overall, in all 5 cities, most people went to a cafe to have a cup of coffee or tea, in contrast, least people bought fresh coffee. The city of melbourne have the highest number of coffee/tea lovers who goes to cafe, while people of Adelaide prefer the least on going to a cafe. Less than 35% of people in cities of Brisbane and Adelaide bought fresh coffee in the last month.
Among the people who prefer going to cafe for coffee/tea, Melbourne tops this chart with approximately 64% of people, followed by Hobart which doesnot have a huge variation in percentage. On the low side, the city of Adelaide have the least number of people visiting a cafe with just under 50%.
Instant coffee was preferred by around 45% - 55% of people in all the five cities. People bought fresh coffee the least in comparison to other two categories, with people of Brisbane and Adelaide liking it no more than 35%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...have a cup of coffee or tea, in contrast, least people bought fresh coffee. The city of...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...ile people of Adelaide prefer the least on going to a cafe. Less than 35% of people in c...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69811320755 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43236894816 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518867924528 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9036545581 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222462100524 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113499690625 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520006628823 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156826846844 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539569207315 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.