The chart below shows the value of one country's export in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The chart illustrates the amount of money that a country earns from different sources of income. On the other hand, the table informs us about the differences in value for each category between the years 2016 and 2015.
Focusing on the chart, we can see that products that have come from petroleum and engineered goods are responsible for most of the income valued around 60 billion dollars in 2015 and the following year.
Conversely, products from agriculture and textiles are the least source of income with a value of almost half compare to the first two. At last, earing for jewelry and gems exports are approximately around 40 billion dollars.
Moving on to the table, we can get information about the changes that the categories went through during one year. First, the only decrease is in the gems and jewelry with a value of 5.18 percent. However, textiles increased the most with 15.24 percent. On the other hand, the least amount of change in the percentages belongs to agricultural products valued less than 1 percent. Lastly, engineered goods and petroleum products have undergone an 8.5 and 3 percent increase respectively.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.to what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 81
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas. 11
- The graph shows the number of minutes of three types of phone calls in Australia between 1992 2000 Summarise the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate 47
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gory between the years 2016 and 2015. Focusing on the chart, we can see that p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, lastly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07368421053 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63665300299 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.146332255 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229688065141 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819849087909 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659316857928 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130407937288 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595947191475 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.