The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph gives information about the export earnings of a country in five different fields between 2015 and 2016. The table illustrates the change rates in each category of exports within the same period.
Overall, petroleum products and engineered goods were among the products that had highest exported earnings. In addition, almost all categories shown experienced a rise in their percentage changes in values, with the exception of gems and jewellery.
Firstly, looking at the chart, the value for export earnings of petroleum was $60 billions in 2015, which was the highest number at that time, followed by engineered goods with around $57 billions. In contrast, textiles was the least exported product, with its exported earnings only accounted for $25 billions. By 2016, the number of export earnings for most categories, except for gems and jewellery, had increased slightly, ranging from $1 billion to $5 billions each.
Secondly, as displayed in the table, textiles had the highest growing rate in terms of values, increasing by 15.24% from 2015 to 2016. The percentage change for engineered goods was also high, with an increase of 8.5% during the given period. On the other hand, gems and jewellery saw a decline in its exported rate, with a decrease of 5.18% in total.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
... in their percentage changes in values, with the exception of gems and jewellery. Firstly, looki...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry, had increased slightly, ranging from billion to billions each. Secondly...
^^
Line 9, column 436, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
..., had increased slightly, ranging from billion to billions each. Secondly, as di...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased slightly, ranging from billion to billions each. Secondly, as display...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, except for, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21256038647 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62350422028 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574879227053 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7471737741 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289490433862 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1208228304 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564413016631 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191365293432 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819048354533 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.