The chart below shows the value of one's country exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentages change in each categories of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The provided bar graph below illustrates the export earnings made by a typical country in multifarious categories in the year 2015 and 2016 in billions of dollar. A table is also provided which shows the change in percentages among these categories of exports in 2016 with respect to 2015.
Overall, of all five categories, it is conspicuous that decrease in exports are only for gems and jewellery. Whereas, all other four shows an increment in exports.
Major jump in export earning was made by Textiles export which was around 15.24%, ranging from about 24 billion in 2015 and 32 billion in 2016 according to the graph. Second major jump in export earnings was made by Engineering goods, with an increment of 8% from the year 2015 to 2016. Agricultural products showed a least increment of around 0.8% only.
In 2016, Petroleum and its products showed a little increment in export earnings from about 61 billion to about 64 billion, which concludes to percentage change of 3%. In contrast to all four categories, Gems and Jewellery had showed some decrement in export business, it was around 45 billion in 2015 which was decreased to around 41 billion in 2016, thus showing a 5.18% decrement.
Comments
gn
gn
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...xports are only for gems and jewellery. Whereas, all other four shows an increment in e...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...5 to 2016. Agricultural products showed a least increment of around 0.8% only. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, thus, well, whereas, in contrast, in contrast to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93596059113 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67253978046 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6006655444 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373767715651 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179330150808 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123470476882 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249849031146 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147831723848 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.