The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
The bar graph illustrates the employment background of Anthropology alumni of a university. The table compares how much they earned after 5 years working as anthropologist.
Overall, it is clear that most of alumni were employed and a government sector offered the most attractive salaries for them after a half of decade.
To begin with, the majority of graduates were involved in full-time, either employment or postgraduate, 52% and 8% in turn. The percentage of graduates who have only part time job is triple than those who combined both job and postgraduate education, 15% and 5% respectively. Only 12% of people were between jobs, while the rest of people’s destinations were unknown.
As for government sector, the half of graduates who earned over $100 000 works in there. However, regarding freelance consultants, they had an equal proportion of graduates (40%) who had salaries over $100 000 and between $75000 and $100000. Finally, there were more graduates in private companies earning below $75 000 (45%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the alumni') or simply say ''most alumni''.
Suggestion: most of the alumni; most alumni
...hropologist. Overall, it is clear that most of alumni were employed and a government sector o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...e percentage of graduates who have only part time job is triple than those who combined b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vate companies earning below 5 000 45%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, regarding, while, as for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17682926829 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03466855948 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646341463415 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8135770466 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135043240907 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606090005823 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621431002389 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905387032569 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600071200984 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.