The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree courses. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart illustrates the destination of anthropology bachelors from a college after the acquisition of a tertiary degree. The following table reveals their earnings after 5 years’ work.
As can be seen clearly from the chart, more than a half, 52%, of anthropology students found full-time jobs after graduating. While 15% chose to be part-time workers, 12% of anthropology graduates were unoccupied. Whereas, the number of degree’s holders continuing pursue higher education full-time and being unknown were equal at 8%, followed by 5% who were working part-time and attending higher education at the same time.
Regarding salaries of anthropology bachelors, freelance and government employees witnessed the same pattern at the number of former students gaining $25000-49999 and $50000-74999 for 5% and 15% respectively. However, freelance consultants have fewer graduates landing high-paid jobs at over $100000 than the government sector with 40% and 50%. On the other hand, there are no striking features in terms of graduates working at private firms, the largest group is those earning $50000-74999 at 35%.
In conclusion, the chart and the table show us that most anthropology bachelors are employed and their salaries were more than $25000, irrespective of graduates’ kind of jobs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, whereas, while, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60101010101 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99956208755 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631313131313 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4896112117 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.222222222 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207283532086 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993452833996 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771167575541 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151090381148 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848904238731 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.