The chart give information about rates of smoking in men and women from year 1960 to 2000.
The given line graph represents information about rates of smoking in some land by men and women; from 1960 to 2000. The data is calibrated in numbers of individuals. It is clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it can be seen that; rate of smoking for both genders was almost same in year 2000. In 1960 plethora of men were involved in smoking than women.
It is evident that, in year, 2000 both genders had been involved in smoking with almost same proportion which lies in the number of 200 to 240 individuals approximately. In addition to this, there was a difference seen by men and women from year, 1975 to 1995. It ranges from 300 to 210 for females and 500 to 300 for males.
As far as trend was concerned; it had been clearly mentioned in the line graph that, about more than 500 individuals (men) prefer to smoke in 1970, while in the same year female number is far and far less about 200 persons (females) only. Moreover, from year 1960 to 1965 both sexes show great variation in their number. Moving forward, it is clear from line graph that; number of males was 600 which had six times more than females.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rward, it is clear from line graph that; number of males was 600 which had six t...
^^
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r from line graph that; number of males was 600 which had six times more than fe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53431372549 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41205860636 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524509803922 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.6544365813 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0909090909 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368557911778 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146780923224 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141112622366 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266550822506 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092511308995 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.