The two pie charts give information of five different sorts of energy production (coal, other, nuclear, Petro, gas) by France in the years 1995 and 2005. The data is calibrated in per centum.
Overall, maximum amount of energy was produced by coal, while least amount of energy was generated with the help of other sources in both years.
It is Crystal clear that in the year 1995 coal (29.80%) seem to be the best source to produce energy, while other contributed least only 4.90 percent. On other side, remained two sources named Petro as well as gas assist to produced energy in the proportion 29.27, 29.63 respectively.
It is clear represented in the second pie chart that in the year 2005, large amount of energy produced by coal (30.93%) which is slightly more as compare to previous year. Similarly, less amount of energy 9.10 per centum generated by other source. In comparison, gas contributed 30.31 percent in the year 2005 that is maximum in this year as compare to the year 1995. However, Petro contributed 29.27 percent in the year 1995 and in the ending year it was 19.55 by same source.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'while the least'.
Suggestion: while the least
... amount of energy was produced by coal, while least amount of energy was generated with the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...d by coal 30.93% which is slightly more as compare to previous year. Similarly, le...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, similarly, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76041666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40060665799 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526041666667 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3336472053 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163912230357 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732744263468 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091045223707 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122152300811 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897907457272 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.