The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The pie charts elucidate the types of energy which produced by France and compared between two years (1995 and 2005). Overall, the biggest proportions were in the production of gas and coal between two years. Nonetheless, other type of energy had the lowest proportion in each year.
In 1995, the largest proportion of energy which produced by France was coal. This was followed by gas energy with a slight difference of 0,17% and Petro about 30% in third position. At the same year, the other type of energy gained the least at nearly 5% of energy advancement. Furthermore, after a decade, the ranked position of energy production did not change. In 2005, coal and gas that produced by France saw a slight increase. In addition to that, the production of petro decreased by 9,72%. In contrast, nuclear and other energy experienced an increase even it was just a slight. Nuclear was increased by 3,7% while, the other energies increased by almost 5%. It is also evident that at this period, both nuclear had a massive difference compared to gas with almost double of its percentage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... slight. Nuclear was increased by 3,7%. While the other energy increased by almost 5%...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nonetheless, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87878787879 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49667547546 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.5777114898 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.9230769231 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.6923076923 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23771348455 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885987895227 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584813775103 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20429064573 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466618237271 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.