In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people earn.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There are several workers pay with enormous amount of wages in some nations. Although some community think that a nation will get positive impact from this condition, while others disagree and want the government to apply a new policy to control wages and make a limitation in the amount of worker's earnings.
The amount of wages that received by workers could effect to their productivities. Workers who paid with a higher salary, tend to work harder than those who do not. For instance, a sales person would work hardly to get a new approach to achieve sales' goal. The more they make sales, the more they would receive their bonuses. The company which has a sales person who always achieve their target could experience an increase in their sales and performance. The increase of company's welfare would bring a positive impact to one country's economy. In addition to this, the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) would be increased.
On the contrary, it is not all about the money that received by workers. High wages could not guarantee a worker to perform well. Firstly, some workers do not like the competitive culture to get higher salaries. This could lead to under performance of the company. Secondly, the company that has wild expense in wages would limit their quota of workers. This could lead to the country's unemployment and increase criminal rates.
In conclusion, there are many positive and negative impacts of this fact. However, I personally agree that workers should get high salaries due to high performance. But the company should examine their workers to promote justice. Therefore, the country could experience a significant rise in nation's well being.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...of wages that received by workers could effect to their productivities. Workers who pa...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'work'.
Suggestion: hardly work
...not. For instance, a sales person would work hardly to get a new approach to achieve sales ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ncrease in their sales and performance. The increase of companys welfare would brin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06474820144 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56138346694 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535971223022 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.361526421 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1052631579 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6315789474 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115782187359 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367656359081 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441228718643 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889140970143 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058230644205 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.