The chart shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003-2012
The line chart represents the alternations in three main categories of crimes in the centre of Newport city between 2003 and 2012. Overall, the number of burglary incidents experienced more noticeable changes in the chart. While, the robbery was far lower than the other two crimes.
As the graph shows, the robbery level in the inner city started at 700 in 2003, followed by a small increase to 900 by 2005. Then, it declined steadily until it fell to roughly 500 occurrences in 2008. After that, it rose with some fluctuations and at the same point as 2003. Regarding car theft, in 1985 number of incidents occurred at around 2,800, but then it leveled off for a year. This figure collapsed moderately from 2004 to 2005, then dramatically throughout the year when it reached at its lowest point at nearly 2000. Afterwards, the figure moved forward to as it was in 2003.
By contrast, the offence damages in burglary experienced considerable drop in 4 years period after 2004 from the highest level at 3780. In 2008, the kind of crime stood at 1000, but this number shot up to almost 1400. We can see that, the occurrences during car theft continued to rise and it is expected to climb. The two types of crime decreased over the period except the car theft.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d more noticeable changes in the chart. While the robbery was far lower than the othe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, so, then, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6981981982 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51838463704 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3156343374 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2307692308 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161275912855 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566113738386 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815731663073 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125190744336 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929164889717 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.