The chart shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2000-2012.
The line graph compares how many burglaries, car thefts and robberies committed in Newport city centre between 2003 and 2012.
Overall, the number of burglary recorded decreased significantly over the period while car theft's cases fluctuated. The figure for robbery remained relatively stable. It is also noticeable that from 2003 to 2006 burglary was the most common committed crime but was replaced by car theft in the following years.
In 2003, there were nearly 3500 of burglaries recorded and the figure rose to peak at around 3800 in 2004, before declining continuously to hit a low of just over 1000 in 2008. The number went up to almost 1500 in 2009 and remained the same until 2012.
Robbery comprised the lowest number of cases over the period where its figure hovered between 500 and just under 1000. The number of car thefts that transpired was around 3000 from 2003 to 2005, and fluctuated slightly over the following 4 years when the lowest figure was noted. Then, subsequently it grew to approximately 1,500 in 2010 before levelling off.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, car thefts and robberies committed in Newport city centre between 2003 and 201...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03389830508 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52801974787 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1231042218 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0739634816788 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317028238435 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047308676113 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.058106855908 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536557675889 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.