The chart shows the changes in UK citizens’ travel aims from 1994 to 1998, along with the bar chart providing data on their preferred routes during the same period.
The table illustrates the trends in UK citizens’ travel aims from 1994 to 1998, along with the bar chart providing data on their preferred routes during the same period.
Overall, the number travelers had generally increased, especially in those going for their holidays. It is also noticeable that British residents favored western European countries to any other, and their number was rising across the timescale all these years, except in 1995.
As for the purpose, holidays were by far the most popular reason, which attracted over 15,000 in 1994 compared to nearly 20,000 in 1998. On the second spot was business that demonstrated a steady growth, reaching almost 4,000 trips. British people started visiting their friends and kin more often over the observation period, beginning with the lowest number 2,689 and ending at 3,181. By contrast, travelling by other reason was never more than 1,054 (in 1997).
Regarding the destination, an increasing number of households chose Western Europe, and the figures ranged between nearly 18,000 and over 24,000. The shares of North America and other areas were significantly less and made up approximately 2,000 visits each, but there was a slight increase in the number of tourists
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, second, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30456852792 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54428680507 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.715736040609 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1033746751 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.111111111 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259656655589 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114272327532 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.239058862116 0.0843802449381 283% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229705725557 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.322646248349 0.0819641961636 394% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.