The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The chart illustrates the rate of people's tendency to eat fast food in the USA at 3 different years consist of 2003, 2006 and 2013. Overall, throughout the surveyed period, it can be gained from the chart that, on average, 30% of people eat fast food in the 2 category included once a week and once or twice a month. It shows that most of the people, approximately 60%, are enthusiastic in fast foods, but also they are aware of their bad influence on their health. So they decided to avoid overeating and to use fast food just frequently.
The one surprising statistic data that can be attained from the chart is that the percentages of people who use fast food every day are almost equal to the who never touch fast food.
To compare the rate of consumption in 2003 and 2006, we can see that the amount of people who are addict to fast food and use it every day became less from 2003 to 2006, and they change their habit from every day using to use it several days in the week. This modification shows the improvement in society culture of using fast food. In the other words, over times, peoples are more aware of the danger of using everyday fast food its side effect that can endanger their heath.
To compare the amount of consumption, we can claim that in both 2003 and 2006 the more frequent use of fast food is once a week, however in 2013 it changes to once or twice a month. it also shows that people are more conscious about the disadvantages of fast food too.
To sum up, we can profess that, the less we use fast food, the more we can be healthy. we hope that in the near future we will see the same chart with the change of decreasing the amount of once or twice a month using fast food and augment a few times a year part of that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...6, we can see that the amount of people who are addict to fast food and use it every da...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...13 it changes to once or twice a month. it also shows that people are more conscio...
^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out the disadvantages of fast food too. To sum up, we can profess that, the less...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... fast food, the more we can be healthy. we hope that in the near future we will se...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 5.60731707317 589% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 333.0 196.424390244 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.28528528529 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24825270506 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441441441441 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.5596759595 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.916666667 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299734863379 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142818551955 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708291827826 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19799590777 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681071555912 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.9 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.