In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
The idea of how spending government budget that has been dedicated to transportation could be monumental controversy in different countries. Some believe that spend the money on the new construction such as the railway is a better idea while others insist on updating and improving the existing public transportation will be worth than others idea.
The beneficial aspects of spending money on new railway could be categorized into 2 section. First of all, by constructing a new railway, it will make the commuting between cities more facilitated especially for whom works far away from their living area. The second reason is that it can have an influence on our economy by providing new job condition for young workers. Manufacturing a new railway, could raise the number of people that can be transported on a certain day.
However, on other hands, if they allocation their money to the available public transport, it will make this transport to be more modern. Additionally, they would phase out the old transport and substitute the new one. The aim of this work is that by replacing modern and updated transportation we will reduce the air pollution and contamination, as well as the equipment, will be safer to use.so in this way it would be more environmentally friendly.
Personally, I agree with the first idea, and I think the advantages of fast and easy transporting, and make more job position, would be more useful for our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: WORTH_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse', the comparative of 'bad'?
Suggestion: worse
... existing public transportation will be worth than others idea. The beneficial asp...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'section' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sections'.
Suggestion: sections
...new railway could be categorized into 2 section. First of all, by constructing a new ra...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, well, while, i think, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04149377593 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0432113484 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585062240664 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7093138464 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331780115965 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135240243326 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877635379018 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191045716865 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09149385167 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.