It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
The desire to have a more intriguing life has permeated every realm of life. Due to the fact myriad of people spend much time engaging in their work, for finding the optimum way for a more enjoyable life, we cannot overlook the significance of our profession. Therefore, there is a unanimous consensus about the huge impact of our job on our daily life, but there is a controversy surrounding the desirable format of our jobs. Many think it is much better to work only in three days, even for a very long time rather than working in a shorter time but for five days, while others disagree. In my vantage point, there are pros and cons to each statement, but overall, the positive effects of working for three days outweigh. In the following paragraphs, I express two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
First and foremost, because modern cities are very crowded, and always congestion traffic exist, we cannot do anything besides our professional works in the days that we designate for work. Nowadays, people are mostly living in the cities that have many populations, and It is likely that we should spend much time for commuting to go and return from our works; hence, we do not have any time to perform other activities like going out with our family members or having a good meal in a good restaurant. As a result, it is wiser to do our professional works in the fewer days and have a longer weekend. For example, after I graduated from my university, I recruited in an engineering company. In the beginning, I, personally, select to work in five days (even we have other options) because I think in this way, I can have more time with my families, especially, every evening. After a while, I found that was a sweet illusion, and I changed my work format. This example embodies that the shorter day format affords people to have a sparer time.
In the second place, I cannot perform multitasking, very well. I prefer to concentrate on one problem each time. Therefore, it has more lucrative aspects to work in more compound days with long hours to be focus on my professional works. Moreover, after work-days, I can easily focus on my spare time and find ways to have a more relishable time. As a case in point, the days that I worked in five days a week, multitude time I made decision to go out with my friends and have fun with them. Because I was engaged with my works issue, simultaneously, most of the time my friends were irritated because of my demeanor. Eventually, they said that they prefer not to going out with me in my work-days. Now, I think to myself, If I had had another work format, they might not have made that decision!
In the final analysis, based on the reason that have been mentioned above and some other lateral aspects, having shorter day work format, not only does help us to be more prosperous in our professions but also it facilitates more enjoyable life for us. If you cast doubts on my points, I will invite you to see my friends; they clear up your doubts, I bet!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 612, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are pros'?
Suggestion: there are pros
...e others disagree. In my vantage point, there is pros and cons to each statement, but overall...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1014, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...ies that the shorter day format affords people to have a sparer time. In the second p...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, as a result, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 75.0 43.0788530466 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2480.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 543.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56721915285 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62592758097 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482504604052 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 800.1 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.6459028614 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.727272727 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6818181818 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356528297908 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106154304982 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748828779177 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234056569874 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298026170077 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.