It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.

The matter of establishing a suitable working hour, which people unanimously agree upon, has long been a controversial issue in societies. In this context, individuals are often express contrasting views. While some hold the opinion that working fewer days a week but for long hours is more beneficial, others positively oppose this view and assert that one has to work more days a week and for fewer hours per day. A far as I am concerned, I opt to support the latter. In what follows, I will delve into the reasons substantiating my standpoint.

First thing to mention is that working for longer hours causes exhaustion and fatigue, thereby affecting one’s efficiency in work place adversely. Each person has to work only for eight hours a day, as it is suggested by health organizations and is decreed by work legislation, and exceeding this limit certainly deteriorates his productivity. In such situation, one’s mind does not respond properly to fulfill his job’s descriptions and he is prone to err more frequently.Besides, Making mistakes due to fatigue might have other inevitable consequences too. For example, an employee who works long hours a day might not conduct his affairs well enough causing his boss dissatisfaction and probably get expelled from his Job.

Moreover, having long holidays per week means that people have numerous amount of time to rest and having pleasure. Although not immediate, but such lifestyle makes people lax eventually. As a result, when their working days start over, they find it hard adapting to intense physical activities. After a while, they do not experience the same pleasant feeling which they had during works before and begin to absorb physical and mental tensions caused by Job’s discontent.
Finally, although it might seem that three working days is a tempting alternative for employees, from an employer’s perspective it is not an appealing option at all. In this scenario, businesses have to extend their working hours to night hours and most of them do not opt to choose this schedule since this will increase their utility payments. For instance, electricity tariff is higher during hours of high demand which always occur in the night. Having considered it from a different perspective, it is plain that fewer working days is not a pleasant alternative.

To sum up, I strongly believe that working five days a week and for shorter hours is a far better option than fewer working days and long hours. This is because, working more than eight hours a day causes fatigue, thereby decreasing productivity. Also, having more off-days develop laziness and finally, from an employer’s view, extended working hours in a day charges extra money for utility bills.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t working fewer days a week but for long hours is more beneficial, others positiv...
^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
... and he is prone to err more frequently.Besides, Making mistakes due to fatigue might h...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, if, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2313.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18609865471 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94376858675 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54932735426 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6082297559 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.65 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449544966026 0.236089414692 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132226933834 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108567372847 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27070416996 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858278304621 0.0645574589148 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.