The Chart shows the number of hours per month that men and women spent with their families in 2000. Summarise the information by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The Chart shows number of hours per month that males and females spent with families in 2000. There are five categories mention on which chart has distributed among males and females.
In the first stage, considering males who spends number of hour with their family. The Unemployed and retired spent an equal hour with their families were 80 hours per month in 2000. Employed full time males were spent 40 hour per month in 2000. For remaining two category Employed part time and housewives were mere spent null hours.
Then considering females number of hours per month in 2000. The unemployed and retired category females spent 75 hours per month in 2000. Housewives and employed part time females spent approximately 37 hours monthly with family in 2000. Employed full time females spent approximately same as housewives and employed part time approximately 35 hours.
In considering all category, there are two groups in which males have null hours for spending hours such as housewives and employed part time. In remaining all category, males exceeded than females who spent number of hours with their family.
In conclusion, males are ahead in all categories except for employed part time and housewives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...re 80 hours per month in 2000. Employed full time males were spent 40 hour per month in 2...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
... Employed full time males were spent 40 hour per month in 2000. For remaining two ca...
^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...ur per month in 2000. For remaining two category Employed part time and housewives were ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...00. For remaining two category Employed part time and housewives were mere spent null hou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... month in 2000. Housewives and employed part time females spent approximately 37 hours mo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...s monthly with family in 2000. Employed full time females spent approximately same as hou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...imately same as housewives and employed part time approximately 35 hours. In consideri...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...g hours such as housewives and employed part time. In remaining all category, males excee...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t number of hours with their family. In conclusion, males are ahead in all cate...
^^
Line 9, column 70, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...d in all categories except for employed part time and housewives.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, then, except for, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50452096065 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.388888888889 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.3638500911 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.9230769231 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2307692308 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29058538666 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16217421913 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129059367467 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189152093906 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113057437028 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.37 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.