The given bar chart illustrates the proportion of Australian small, medium and large enterprises engaging in social media usage for commercial purposes over the course of 5 years, from 2012 to 2016.
Overall, all the three types of companies witnessed an unceasing rise in the use of social media for their business during the given period. In addition, big corporations make use of social networks most, while small enterprises’ use was quite low.
In 2012, large firms make the most use of social networking sites at a staggering 80% while the figures for the remaining two companies were much lower, ranging at around 30%. In the next 2 years, there were steady increases of 8% and 20% in the use of social media of small and medium companies, while large ones displayed a marginal decrease of only 3 %.
After hitting a bottom of 53% in 2015, perentage of social network usage of large companies bounced back to 80% in 2016. In a similar way, the other two types of enterprises experienced a steep decline to approximately 30% in 2015, which is followed by a burgeoning growth from 20% to 50% in the case of small companies and 25% tto 55% in that for medium ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...were much lower, ranging at around 30%. In the next 2 years, there were steady inc...
^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... companies bounced back to 80% in 2016. In a similar way, the other two types of enterprises exp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76097560976 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66545083352 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575609756098 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5455338312 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.428571429 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297423785154 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138007778994 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556114237644 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182916795955 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423852980333 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.