The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016.
The given bar chart illustrates the proportion of Australian small, medium and large enterprises that utilized social media for business purposes during a 5 years period, from 2012 to 2016.
Overall, large companies appeared to be more actively engaged in employing social media for commercial purposes than the rest as their rate for media usage stayed above 50% throughout the years. Another noticable trend would be the collective drop in using social network in 2015 among all subjects of study.
In 2012, almost 30% of small enterprises in Australia took advantages of social media for their business affairs. Such rate of medium companies was slightly higher at just over 30% while for large companies, the proportion stood at 80%. The following year, whereas the figure of medium companies rose to almost 50%, there was little to change in the rates of the residual parties. These figures stayed more or less the same in 2014 for medium and large firms, despite a growth of nearly 10% in using social media which small companies experienced.
However, in 2015, a collective and significant decline could be observed in the rate of using social media among 3 types of company: a fall of approximately 7%, 20% and 23% was experienced by small, medium and large companies respectively. This trend did not last long as the figures quickly bounced back to almost 50% for small firms, 55% for medium firms and 80% for large firms in 2016.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dia which small companies experienced. However, in 2015, a collective and signi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9958677686 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54713438721 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557851239669 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1801498808 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319669517666 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143293722361 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828318291834 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213013103624 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459801214516 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.