The chart shows the percentage of men and women living in poverty divided into ten different age groups in the United States in 2008.
The given barchart provides the statistics regarding the portion of the United States of America population which earnings were below minimal for the 2008 divided by age and gender.
The most recognizable trend is the overall decrease in poor people of both sexes till the end of sixties. Another aspect worth attention is that the percentage of females in given figure is higher in each age bucket presented on the graph.
The poverty rate in 2008 stood at over 20 percent among men under 5 years old. Then, throughout the growing up, the number of poor in this category had a graduate drop, reaching the local minimum in a group of 55-59 aged with approximately 7 percent. After that, the data showed a slight rise followed by a slight fall to the graph bottom of about 6 percent for males that are older than 75.
Meanwhile, the number of women was only slightly higher than men for groups that are younger 17. However, the portion of ladies in poverty experience a huge increase in 18-24 group reaching the top of around 21 percent and overcoming the corresponding mens group by 5 percent. Then the data showed the dramatic fall to the bottom with 7 percent for 45-54 years old females, after which the number grew slightly to almost 13 percent for the oldest category.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72767857143 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43230657489 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598214285714 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6202598425 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197984798448 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776813459478 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514195377986 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11274961654 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400921954576 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.