The chart shows the percentage of power generated from 6 different types in Gareline
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of the sources of power in Gareline used to generate power from 1970 to 1990. Overall, it is clear that the percentage of hydro power was the highest in 1970 and 1980 and this figure significantly decreased in 1990.
It is noticeable that the percentage of hydro power created about 45 percent in 1970 and approximately three quarters in 1980, but it decreased to 34 percent in 1990. The second most popular source was geothermal power which considerably fluctuated from 1970 to 1990. By 1970, there were around 22 percent of geothermal power and which accounted for 8 percent in 1980. However, this figure increased to 39 percent in 1990.
By contrast, the percentage of wind, gas, nuclear power and other reached just under 20 percent throughout 20 years. The percentage of wind power remained stable in three different periods, whereas nuclear power became to appear in 1980, at 6 percent, then it created 15,5 percent in 1990. The percentage of power generated from gas and other were the lowest over the period of 20 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igure significantly decreased in 1990. It is noticeable that the percentage of ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igure increased to 39 percent in 1990. By contrast, the percentage of wind, gas...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93406593407 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63413263748 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7978287956 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272897099936 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131046389156 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102231482094 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209713468435 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836418455678 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.