Given is a line graph which delineates the comparative data regarding worklessness rate in cities and countryside in Australia in 4 quarters of 2012. A glance at a graph reveals that unemployment rate for urban and rural areas followed different trends and while the figure for rural areas underwent a gradual decrease, almost opposite happened for the urban areas.
However, for all the time covered in the chart, bigger portion of the countryside dwellers was jobless than citizens of urban area. In the beginning, the difference was remarkable with approximately 6.5 percent for rural areas and about a bit above 2 percent for urban areas. Nonetheless, by the last quarter the gap become almost 0.2 percent with approximately 4.8 percent city dwellers and 5 percent rural area residents.
A more detailed look illustrates that, the overall trends were not always steady for both groups. The figure for city dwellers saw a considerable growth followed by a significant fluctuation. While the figure for country dwellers underwent a negligible oscillation before it experienced a progressive downfall.
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world Why is this What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy 84
- Nowadays more and more people are having consumer goods like refrigerators and washing machines 89
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same number of holidays in a year or people doing different jobs enjoy different amount of holiday time To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nonetheless, regarding, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35057471264 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00987606783 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8745644573 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.375 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.029574559434 0.215688989381 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0149146022076 0.103423049105 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0228959434803 0.0843802449381 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0214121395035 0.15604864568 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217726702149 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.