The charts below compare five different countries, showing the electricity used (measured in megawatts or mw) in a typical hospital during one week, and also the number of emergency medical calls made by local residents during the same week. The last chart shows the average time (in minutes) spent on assessing emergency cases by hospital medical staff before the patients are treated.
A glance to the graph reveals the comparison of electricity allocation in a typical hospital per week, number of emergency cases by hospital medical staffs precede the patients are treated.
We can see that during the weekends electricity is being used at their high points in five of them. The higher percentage of megawatts is being used in Canada, while allocation of electricity in Argentina is the lowest.
The dials of emergency cases partially follow this pattern. The calls made by locals of Canada has been steady from Monday to Tuesday. However, it has been moderately increased during weekends. Thus, it reached it is climax point with the 160 dials per week. In contrast, the calls that made in Argentina had not changed and it makes a plateau.
The last graph data indicates that Russian is the most responsible for their average time spent on evaluating emergency cases by hospital staff before treatment. Nonetheless, Argentina remained static with 12 minutes everyday. In contrast, Canada wasted only 11 minutes in average, which is the minimum minute among them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cy cases partially follow this pattern. The calls made by locals of Canada has been...
^^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...gentina remained static with 12 minutes everyday. In contrast, Canada wasted only 11 min...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nonetheless, so, thus, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1186440678 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65930709037 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621468926554 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4212386134 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3636363636 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238678408908 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753143312793 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569158632905 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136608681237 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612845020939 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.