The charts below give information about the electricity generation in two countries in 2009.
The four pie charts illustrate the proportion of three different types of produced electricity in Germany and France in 2009.
Overall, Germany generated more electricity than France in 2009. The most produced kind was conventional thermal electricity, whereas renewables the least. On the opposite hand, the majority of generated energy in France was nuclear. Most of the renewables comprised of biomass and wind in Germany, meanwhile hydroelectricity in France.
In regard of German electricity generation, they produced almost 60% of conventional thermal energy, leaving renewables and nuclear power sources at 17.4% and 23.0%, respectively. The renewables comprised of two large energy sources, biomass and wind, both at just below 40%. Solar energy accounted for the smallest amount in renewable energy at approximately 6%.
As for the energy of France, nuclear power accounted for about three quarters of all types of energy in 2009, but the produced renewable and conventional energy were just over 10% each. Turning to renewables, hydroelectricity was the biggest power source at 80.5% whereas other kinds of produced renewables accounted for merely 10%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63636363636 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04748914397 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539772727273 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0998753115 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131294793815 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613098626321 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675912449177 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926501224643 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041845111811 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.