The graph below shows the amount of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
The line graph illustrates the number of products conveyed using four different types of transport systems (road, water, rail and pipeline) in time period between 1974 and 2002 in the UK. Units are measured in million tonnes.
Overall, the biggest amount of goods was transported by road throughout the whole time period, whereas the least used way for transferring products was pipeline. Furthermore, there was an increase in the amount of conveyed good for all ways of transportation, except for rail which stayed the same.
With regard to road transportation, it experienced increase from about 70 million tonnes to just below 100 tonnes. Likewise, the amount of goods conveyed using water grew for approximately 30 million tonnes (from just below 40 in 1974 to around 70 in the final year). Turning to pipeline transportation, it experienced a relatively small increase in the amount transported during the first 8 years from around 5 million tonnes to 15, then plateaued for about 10 years (till 1992), grew to just above 20 million tonnes, reaching its peak in 1995 and stayed fixed in the final years.
On the other hand, railway transportation began at 40 million tonnes in the first year, fluctuated throughout the period, hitting a low of 25 million tonnes in 1995, after increasing back to 40 million tonnes in 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...d 2002 in the UK. Units are measured in million tonnes. Overall, the biggest amount o...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: ALL_WAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'always'?
Suggestion: always
...ease in the amount of conveyed good for all ways of transportation, except for rail whic...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, likewise, then, whereas, except for, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03181818182 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81795820227 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559090909091 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5627881386 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.375 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238827085813 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105184456821 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688731307457 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134007279574 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527866744792 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.