The charts below give information about the percentage of the budget spent on some activities and the results of the activity which did by an environmental group over five years at the local level.
A breakdown of budget allocation for some activities and its outcome for five years is presented in the bar chart. Those activities conducted by a group of the environment at the local level.
Overall, investments in some environmental activities are successful, especially in creating zones of urban environment which experiences a significant increase in an urban mammals number.
Construction of the urban environmental area has attracted more than a third mammal, with spending money around 24% of the budget. It is followed by the other two activities, opening areas and planting trees to captivate migratory birds and forest creatures. Although they obtain the same investment number, the increasing of the migratory bird is lower than creatures of woodland, at 28% and 30%.
Almost a fifth of the budget spends to clean canals, and it makes fish and aquatic birds healthier than before. On the other hand, aquatic mammals experience a slight decline to just around a fifth because they are more comfortable with the bad environment. Unfortunately, in campaign categories, fighting illegal hunting is totally failed while another movement shows the reverse.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44505494505 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03354927522 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648351648352 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2999803691 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0619259492453 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0248012329433 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249947845133 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0391247794759 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278088342268 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.