The charts below give information about the work carried out by a regional environmental group over five years
A breakdown of budget allocation for some activities and its outcome for five years is presented in the bar chart. Those activities conducted by a group of the environment at the local level.
Overall, investments in some environmental activities are successful, especially in creating zones of urban environment which experiences a significant increase in an urban mammals number.
Constructing urban environmental area has attracted more than a third mammal, with spending money around 24% of the budget. It is followed by the other two activities, opening areas and planting trees. to captivate migratory birds and forest creatures. Although they obtain the same investment number, the increasing of the migratory bird is lower than creatures of woodland, at 28% and 30%.
Almost a fifth of the budget spends to clean canals, and it makes fish and aquatic birds healthier than before. On the other hand, aquatic mammals experience a slight decline to just around a fifth because they are more comfortable with the bad environment. Unfortunately, in campaign categories, fighting illegal hunting is totally failed while another movement shows the reverse.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...ties, opening areas and planting trees. to captivate migratory birds and forest cr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50555555556 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03475241531 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655555555556 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5373147681 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0738687063379 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0263421680379 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341498636039 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0385094992831 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415662074552 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.