The charts below give the information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the proportion of population differentiate by age in two cities of Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 together with the projections for 2050. Overall, Yemen and Italy were really different regarding on the population.
In 2000, the biggest population in Yemen belonged to the group of 0-14 years with 50.10%, which occupied half of the city. Followed with 46.30% of population from group of 15-59 years. Yemen had only 3.60% of people with age more than 60 years. However, Yemen prognosticate that the city will occupy with more productive groups of 15-59 years instead of younger or older age. Moreover, citizen that already surpassed 60 years, remained being the lowest measurement of population.
In the other hand, Italy did not have similar proportion to Yemen. In early 2000, group of 15-59 years occupied nearly three fourth of the city population, which was 61.60%. Group of more than 60 years came in second, unexpectedly. Italy predicted within 50 years, the highest proportion of 46.20% still belonged to the same group of age. People of more than 60 years only had the difference of approximately 4% to the biggest percentage. Group of 0-14 years came in last with 11.50%.
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 61
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 67
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The diagram shows the process by which sheep embryos are cloned Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, really, regarding, second, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02487562189 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66444735748 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9489474201 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6923076923 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4615384615 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135428885781 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592107947404 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739066858558 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136053986346 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962562027565 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.