The charts below give the information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the proportion of population differentiate by age in two cities of Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 together with the projections for 2050. Overall, Yemen and Italy were really different regarding on the population.
In 2000, the biggest population in Yemen belonged to the group of 0-14 years with 50.10%, which occupied half of the city. Followed with 46.30% of population from group of 15-59 years, and in addition to that, this city had only 3.60% of people with age more than 60 years. However, Yemen prognosticate that the proportion of elderly with age more than 60 years, would be doubled to nearly 6%. Group of 15-59 years also gain some populations because the measurement increased drastically to exactly 57.30%. Lastly, people in between of 0-14 years, faced some reduction in percentage which fell to 37%.
In the other hand, Italy did not have similar level of population as Yemen. In early 2000, group of 15-59 years nearly occupied three fourth of the city with approximately 61.60%, unfortunately, Italy predicted it would also decreased extremely to 46.20%. The second biggest proportion belonged to group of elderly and group of 0-14 years came in last, with 24.10% and 14.30% respectively. The latter would experience a loss of around 3%, hence, it would become 11.50% of the city population. Moreover, group of more than 60 years, would be having population which will be twice from the previous 50 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'decrease'
Suggestion: decrease
...tunately, Italy predicted it would also decreased extremely to 46.20%. The second biggest...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, lastly, moreover, really, regarding, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03734439834 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6862148867 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51867219917 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8179015437 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.166666667 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129404921494 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636432069029 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771338659323 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134413276034 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967556127119 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.