The table demostrates the change in six types of transportation used by commuters in three cities between 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table demonstrates the significant changes in market share of different types of transportation which used by people in 3 cities in Australia between 2000 and 2010. Overall, from 3 different cities, Perth experienced the dramatic changes among the rest.
Throughout the years, personal vehicles faced a downfall of shares in all cities, with -2.9, -2.9, and -3.3 respectively. Besides personal vehicles, walk and work at home also experienced fluctuated market shares. For walk, the only city with increased shares was Perth, added 4 shares after 10 years. Meanwhile, Sydney was the only city, which gained exactly 0.6 shares since 10 years ago.
The rest of transportation types encountered with number of shares that rose extremely. Perth, again had been selected as the city with highest market shares in mass transit and other, 21 and 30.2 respectively, as Melbourne and Sydney was competing to avoid having the lowest shares in both transportation types. Lastly, Sydney unexpectedly had 31 of shares in bicycle, make it the highest shares in this sort of transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...th, again had been selected as the city with highest market shares in mass transit and other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, lastly, so, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31395348837 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92910184903 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633720930233 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9685761339 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123210154352 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585405446671 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886174531347 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108117003056 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933635389973 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.