The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts not only provide data about the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000, but also give forecasts by 2050. Overall, it is obvious that senior people over 60 take up the smallest sectors in Yemen, while young people less than 14 represent the least amount in Italy no matter for 2000 or 2050.

For the situation in Yemen, the major sector was taken by people under 60 years old, with 0-14 group and 15-59 group taking up 50.1% and 46.3% respectively in 2000. However, it is projected that people between 15 and 59 (57.3%) will outweigh those under 14 (37.0%) by exactly 20.3%. By comparison, senior people over 60 remain relatively insignificant, accounting 3.6% in 2000 and 5.7% in 2050.

In terms of the composition of age groups in Italy, things are completely different compared with Yemen, and the largest population is taken up by people from 15 to 59 (61.1% in 2000 and 46.2% in 2050). As to old people over 60, it reports that the proportion will increase by 18.2 percent up to 42.3% in 2050. At last, the smallest population is constituted by those under 14, accounting 14.3% in 2000 and 11.5% in 2050.

Votes
Average: 4.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60396039604 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45722149126 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574257425743 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0677914902 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204308635984 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105520298981 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689932458371 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159183975929 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568467839929 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.