The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

The three given pie charts illustrate the information about the proportion of three types of nutrients, which may be harmful if consume too much, including sodium, saturated fat, and added sugar in four different kinds of meal in the USA.
Overall, it can be seen obviously that people tend to consume a lot of sodium for their dinner. In contrast, there is a little one added in the breakfast and snacks of Americans.
Firstly, in dinner, the consumption of sodium is the highest of all, up to 43%, whereas the one of added sugar makes up merely half of that. Remarkably, sugar is favored most in snacks, whose percentage accounts for 42%. Meanwhile, the proportions of sodium and saturated fat for snacks are far less than the one of the aforementioned, only 14% and 21% respectively.
In terms of remaining meals, saturated fat and added sugar share the totally same proportions in breakfast, at 16%, which is higher than the percentage of sodium only 2%. Finally, the intake of the harmful nutrients is not much in American’s lunch, 29% for sodium, 26% for saturated fat, and 19% for added sugar.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, may, so, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83157894737 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74684407176 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4342998332 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148361941626 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604539663018 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832518421179 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101536407079 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101222371767 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.