Some companies sponsor sport as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think it is good, while others think there are disadvantages.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
In these days and ages, sponsorship in sports, as a method of advertising, is becoming more and more common. This change leads to a controversy that some people believe that this kind of advertising has a big deal of benefits for sports, whereas others think it has a few drawbacks.
On the one hand, it is no doubt that sponsorship in sports has several advantages. First of all, there are a lot of large tournaments around the world, such as the FIFA World Cup or Olympics, costing millions of dollars that most organizers are incapable to deal with. Therefore, some big companies will take this cost as sponsors in return by scaling their reputation. Without sponsors, organizations can only rely on the price of spectators’ tickets, as a result, the tickets are extremely precious and nobody affords to buy the one, which can lead the organizations to face bankruptcy. Besides, the sponsors also supply to young teams that create opportunities for children to nurture their passion for sports.
On the other hand, some sponsor companies seem to be only focused on their benefit and profit, which make harmful effects on sports. Some people complain about the contents of a number of advertisements are not suitable for the young generation, one of the main viewers of sports, such as alcohol and tobacco. To illustrate, when they are enjoying a match, then a harmful advertisement takes place, they are more likely to continuously enjoy the one. After that, they see it interesting and then try these poisonous things, imaging how many people watch a World Cup match.
In conclusion, although I believe that the advantages of advertising sponsorship for sports overwhelm its disadvantages, event organizations should consider what type of advertisement could be on screen.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, so, then, therefore, whereas, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08873720137 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96906358294 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590443686007 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6933248055 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9166666667 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170709678541 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611397530152 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059896011205 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101107816987 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334606352024 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.