The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate the median ratios in symbolic meals of various kind of nourishments which is supposed to be harmful to health if consumed excessively.
Overall, lunches and dinners consumed by the USA residents have rich content of salt and saturated fat whilst there is a high amount of added sugar in their snacks.
Analyzing the first spice - salt, the chart shows the homology of the breakfast and the lunch when they have the same percentage of consuming sodium which is 14%. In contrast to the above meals, the Americans use salt the most in the dinner with the high statistic of 43%, and lower than it 14% is that of the lunch. Switching to the second diagram, it is obvious to claim that the USA citizens use saturated fat the most in the dinner with the figure of 37%, higher than the lunch 11%. The snack also contributes to the consumption of 21% hydrogenated fat, then is the breakfast with 16% of the contribution.
Finally, the last pie chart shows the Americans' eating sweet habits because the percentage of 42% added sugar in snacks is evaluated to be considerably high. Despite this fact, they use it for almost half less than in the dinner. Furthermore, the lunch and the breakfast are added less manufactured sweeteners owing to their ratio are 19% and 16% respectively, which is considered to be much lower than the meals above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, in contrast, kind of, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75847457627 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63735695233 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2597482635 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.777777778 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0923098514916 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404181507076 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045530029767 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575465355681 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413418346659 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.