The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts demonstrate the average ratios of three nutritions intakings in four common meals of USA people’s daily basis, simultaneously these nutrients can cause health diseases if over-eaten.
At first glance, the data indicate consumptions of three nutritions in Americans’ breakfasts occupied the least proportions which remain stable from 14 to 16 percent. While the other three meals’ nutritional intakes between sodium, fat, and sugar change more frequently. Firstly, dinner meals pioneer the others as the most consumers of sodium and saturated fat of 43% and 37%, compared to the sugar which is about 20% lower than that consumed from the snacks. Lunch meals tend to retain the same proportions of three nutrients’ intakes which is just slightly around 19 to 29%. In addition, sodium and fat intake from snacks are not as high as those from dinners, but the sugar added is much higher which is accurately 42%, much higher than sugar consumed in the other meals.
Each meal has its own nutritional consumption, but the dinners by and large seize the most sodium, fat, and sugar during the day.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, while, in addition, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14207650273 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66510973092 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8671145897 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.428571429 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136025904393 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685304560747 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410508650562 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921863436425 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510143809788 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.