The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts compare the average proportions in four typical meals of three different types of nutrients(Sodium, Saturated fat and Added sugar), the overconsumption of which could have pernicious effects on health.

Overall, it is clear that Sodium and Saturated fat are major constituents of an American’s dinner, while the opposite is true for breakfast. Meanwhile, snacks contained the highest proportion of added sugar among the four examined meals.

Dinner contains the highest amount of sodium and saturated fat(43% and 37%) illustrated in the charts. Following as the second highest, the consumption of these two nutrients for lunch at 29% and 26% respectively. In contrast, added sugar only makes up for around a quarter of dinner(25%) and merely 19% for lunch.

With regards to breakfast and snacks, interestingly, sodium is taken in at an equal amount of 14% while saturated fats are at a considerably lower percentage of 21% and 16% for snacks and breakfast. In terms of added sugar, snacks make up for the largest amount of sugar intake, having a 42% and a much lower amount of 16% for breakfast.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13114754098 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98192470462 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.625525207 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.375 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0754711411674 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334727530033 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489990308798 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0554763997055 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605619354744 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.