Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In any field, we all need that one person that could critically judge our work, without it, it might be difficult to improve in your given field. However, I mostly agree with the statement that critical judgment could have little or no value coming from a non-expert and this would be highlighted by diving into three fields in this essay.
In the world of technology, and specifically in Information technology, one of the best things to have is a pair programming partner, an expert to criticize your work and solutions you have come up with through coding, this is very helpful in terms of the progression of the programmer's work being analyzed, and research has shown that programmers with pair programmers do better than those that don't, they come to see areas they can improve and it goes on to give them the ability to not repeat similar mistakes in their work. If this same programmer's work was scrutinized and judged by a non-technical person, It would be very difficult to pass judgment on a programming language you know next to nothing about, and thus adding little or no value to the work at hand. In the scenario, we have seen how useful it is for work to be criticized, It is valuable and often encouraged because it leads to more quality work in the future, but we have also seen that from a non-technical person, it could bring little or no value, but this is drawn simply from the field of technology.
In the area of science, that is a critical field in which doctors save lives. Critical judgment is even more important here as the improvement in their specific domain could help save lives. Now, would a person who isn't a doctor or just anyone be able to provide solid advice to a doctor to improve on maybe how to cut a patient open? Not likely. Having an expert and critical feedback or judgment in this case is crucial. But in comparison with no feedback at all, the little feedback or judgment you can get could however be important. In this field and specifically with doctors. A non-expert critical judgment is also going to add little or no value.
However, a judgment could be very valuable even from someone who is not in a specific area . Take for instance, the agricultural sector, farmers can get advice from someone who is an expert in a different field on the days it would rain causing the farmer to make a more informed decision. In another case the farmer could be criticized on the pattern of watering his or her plants and thus lead to better work patterns for that farmer in effect this judgment can be seen as very useful. In this scenario, judgment from a non-expert has come to be very useful in this regard.
All in all, we have looked at different areas and fields in which critical judgment could add little value and in areas where it could add a ton of value. We can't for a certainty with these examples say that only experts can give critical judgment, more research and evidence would be needed to make such a concrete statement.
|2023-02-21||HSNDEK||83||Read full essay|
|2022-08-07||avidwriter1771||50||Read full essay|
|2022-08-05||Bulut99999||79||Read full essay|
|2022-08-01||fortune||50||Read full essay|
|2022-06-22||leadsbbk||50||Read full essay|
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 200773
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve65
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi66
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your pos62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...r programmers do better than those that dont, they come to see areas they can improv...
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...elp save lives. Now, would a person who isnt a doctor or just anyone be able to prov...
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
...person who isnt a doctor or just anyone be able to provide solid advice to a docto...
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
...om someone who is not in a specific area . Take for instance, the agricultural sec...
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: CANT
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...s where it could add a ton of value. We cant for a certainty with these examples say...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, thus, for instance, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2457.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 535.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59252336449 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56207667422 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426168224299 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 767.7 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.223954958 60.3974514979 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7222222222 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291844624702 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106695507348 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051865747883 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190398453397 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443003104322 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 48.8420337079 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 12.1743820225 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.