The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line charts illustrate the data about the remarkable change reported in possession of electrical equipment and amount of time spent on doing households chore in particular country from 1920 to 2019.
In general, the rate of use electrical appliances experienced upward trend in during a century. While the amount of time spent on cleaning their house every week significantly decreased during this period.
It could be easily observed from the line chart that using the refrigerator was not common in 1920, it has been dramatically increased and reached a peak at 100 percent in 1980. After that remained the same of percentage for the rest of years. The consumption of washing machine was higher than vacuum cleaner, about 10 percent during the first time of survey. After experiencing the same amount of usage in 1960,at 70 percent. The vacuum cleaner was surpassed and rose a 100 percent from 2000 to 2019. The same level of washing machine
In comparison with the data of ownership of electrical above, those of the number of hours of housework were completely lower. The amount of time each household spend doing housework was 50 percent per week in 1920 and gradually decreased to nearly 20 percent per week in 1960. Over the rest of the period from 1960 to 2019, there was only around 10 percent in hours.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l appliances experienced upward trend in during a century. While the amount of ti...
^^
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nced upward trend in during a century. While the amount of time spent on cleaning th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...urs of housework were completely lower. The amount of time each household spend doi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90178571429 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59977861597 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9894386137 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8181818182 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226700667307 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814507369841 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089096269975 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164944984744 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107498906955 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.