The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevants
Given is the line graphs illustrating the changes in possession of electrical objects and the amount of time spent on housework in one country from 1920 to 2019. Overall, the first year of the given time saw the highest hours per week, per household, even though the proportion of electrical appliances was the lowest figure in the same year.
As can be seen from the first graph, there was clearly an upward trend within a decade from 1920 to 2019. The figure of the washing machine started at a higher percentage compared to the two other remained, at exactly 40%, whilst the percentage of the refrigerator began at 30% and there was no use of vacuüm cleaner at the same time. After that, in 1940 the percentage of vacuüm cleaner rose sharply to more than a half while the use of washing machine and fridge increased gradually to 60% and 50% respectively. In the next 40 years, though there was a slight fluctuation in the proportion of washing machine, the vacuüm cleaner kept increasing significantly to nearly 100%. However, the refrigerator reached an exact number of a hundred percent and flowed consistently to the end of the decade. The 2 other objects rose marginally, while the vacuüm cleaner ended at 100%, the washing machine stood at approximately 75% in 2019.
Even though it appeared that there was not much use of electrical appliances in 1920, the hours people spend doing chores per week occupied a number of 50, which was the highest. there was a straight drop in the continual 40 years and then reached to just 20 hours a week. This figure then fluctuated modestly and stood at a tenth in 2019, which was also the lowest number of hours of housework per household a week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... a number of 50, which was the highest. there was a straight drop in the continual 40...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 297.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74747474747 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62820441036 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501683501684 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.4929194417 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.181818182 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130425280479 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059194874423 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882899574776 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120035295354 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944326105827 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.