The charts below show changes in the proportion of energy produced from different
resources in a country in 1985 and 2003.
The pie charts depict changes in the percentage of using 6 various sources to produce energy in 1985 and 2003 in a single country.
From an overall perspective, this nation started relying on more natural and renewable resources rather be than nonrenewable ones, such as oil and other nuclear sources. We can also notice the proportion of hydropower hadn’t changed in both years.
Starting with 1985, well over half if the energy produced came from oil accounting for 52 per cent. Next come natural gas and Nuclear power energy resources with a difference of one 9% between their figures. However, coal, hydropower and other renewable resources created a small minority of energy production with figures of 8%, 4% and 1% respectively.
By 2003, the proportions for eco-friendly and environment preserving sources rose considerably by an average of 10%. Furthermore, natural gas accounted of the energy, while the percentage of coal was 22%. Both hydro energy and renewable resources stood at 4%, as the figure for renewable resources slightly increased by 3% compared to 1985. On the other hand, the usage of oil in order to produce power significantly dropped to only 39%. Some went for Nuclear resources, showing a sharp decrease of 14%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13300492611 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85169346127 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645320197044 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.508928471 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7272727273 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320011794547 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104221815184 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738905159859 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192286552659 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646389416457 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.