The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.
Write a report for a university lecture describing the information shown below.
The bar graphs illustrates the various levels of contribution of developing and industrialised nations in education and science during a decade(1980-1990)
Overall, the participation of industrialised countries was highest than the developing countries in all three aspects throughout the decade.
On the one hand, years of schooling in developing nations had merely went up in 10 years( just about one year). Moreover, this rate is almost similar in scientists and technicians per 1000 people where they had slightly increased about 5 persons from 1980 to 1990.
While in 1980, this nations had spent approximately 50 billion on reaserch and development. However, this amount goes down to nearly 25 billion in 1990.
On the other hand, in 1980, the average years of schooling in industrialised countries was more than 8 years, whereas this rate was climbed to approximately 11 years in 1990. The numbers of proficients had grown approximately 4.5% to 7% from 1980 to 1990 and wages spent on reaserch and development had also went up to 350 billion in 1990( double from 1980).
To sum up, both the nations had increased over the decade in all three levels but increased in industrialised countries is significantly higher than developing countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The bar graphs illustrates the various levels of contribution of d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 16, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...sons from 1980 to 1990. While in 1980, this nations had spent approximately 50 bill...
^^^^
Line 8, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proximately 4.5% to 7% from 1980 to 1990 and wages spent on reaserch and developm...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18651847633 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4884249335 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191636037836 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867960709993 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698502360559 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11506515017 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572386189901 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.