The line graph enumerates the information of various types of meat consumed in a European Nation from 1979 to 2004. A glance of line graph reveals that fish is less likely to be preferred by Europeans during the whole period, but their test has been changed for chicken since 1979 to 2004.
Now, turning to the details, in 1979 beef is mostly liked by the European's and highly consumed over 200 grams per person per week.
There after the consumption has been varied for the next 10 years and afterwards it got a steady drop to become nearly half of that in 2004. The similar trend was seen in the intake of lamb which was consumed 150 grams by a person per week in 1979 and reduced to approximately half of that in the year 2004.
Although fish and lamp preference decreased throughout the period, but the chicken consumption grew over the 25 years of period and people ate 150 grams of chicken on a weekly basis in 1979 which climbed up to 250 grams in 2004. However, fish consumption was the lowest throughout the period and drop from average consumption of 60 grams in 1979 to 40 grams in 2004.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: Thereafter
...med over 200 grams per person per week. There after the consumption has been varied for the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50248756219 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37922287056 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512437810945 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.9401821193 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238001342527 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125089707835 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610216437557 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141910674086 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728902338274 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.