the charts below show the number of visitors arriving in a particular country for a short trip, and the number of residents leaving that country for a short trip, from 2009 to 2011. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line chart displays how many foreigner arrivals and resident departures happen in a particular country in terms of a short trip between October 2009 to October 2011. Overall, it is manifest that the number of citizens going out of the country for short trip showed an upward trend, whereas the number of foreigners visiting that country had a downward trend.
Starting with the foreigners, whose number of visits started around 490 thousand in October 2009 and flattened out at 500 thousand from February to May in 2010. Although the figure had increased again before reaching its peak at over 520 thousand visitors in October 2010, it dropped steadily after that, returning to around 490 thousand people in June 2011.
Shifting to the residents of the country, whose numbers of departures showed a dramatically growth over the period, starting from 550 thousand of leaving in October 2009 to its highest point around 650 thousand in June 2011. Besides that, during the period, there was no sight of declining in its number.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...try, whose numbers of departures showed a dramatically growth over the period, starting from 550 thou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, may, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0523255814 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46957555204 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6925109351 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.833333333 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303093442028 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147079309504 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107314970287 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205874743469 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148795908832 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.