The given illustration compares the amounts spent on restaurant foods and on home cooking foods in four different years and the line graph gives the data how many meals have eaten in the two different types of restaurants.
As shown in the pie chart, initially in 1970, 90% of food budget was spent on home-made foods while only 10% was spent on restaurant meals. After a decade, the amount spent on restaurant meals changed to 15% and it increased to 35% in 1990. Finally, in 2000, an average family spent half of the total budget in restaurant meals and that shows a rapid increase in the people’s habit of having meals in restaurants.
In the line graph, we can observe that in the year 1970, they both were started at 20 number of meals per year and over the years these numbers kept increasing. Finally, in 2000, 90 number of meals were eaten in fast food restaurants while the sit down restaurant meals were eaten 50 number of meals per year. It shows the habit of eating fast food over the home-made food.
Overall, it is clear that there was an increasing trend in the money spent on having meals in restaurants throughout the years and fast food restaurant was favored by people than in a sit down restaurant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...re eaten in fast food restaurants while the sit down restaurant meals were eaten 50 num...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...estaurant was favored by people than in a sit down restaurant.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6301369863 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48052399947 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497716894977 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.864448989 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497587375196 0.215688989381 231% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232806619829 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863357440126 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308039688051 0.15604864568 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482316928585 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.