The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organisations in 2008 and 2014.
The pie charts compare proportions of volunteers categorized by organizations in the two years 2008 and 2014.
Overall, the overall trend is for increasing percentages of volunteers to be represented by those working in education, health care and unspecified fields, while the opposite is true for the other three. Also, it is noteworthy that in both years, health care remained the least attractive area for volunteers.
In 2008, nearly a quarter of the total volunteers worked for environment, followed closely by the figure for educational organizations at slightly over one fifth. The year 2014 saw opposite changes for these two, with the former decreasing by 7% and the latter recording an 8% increment.
Art was the second most popular field in 2008, of which volunteers comprised 18% while healthcare was the least prominent, attracting only 7%. However, after 6 years, there was a 6% decline in the figure for art organizations. By contrast the proportion of volunteers in healthcare rose slightly, by 1%. Initially, those volunteering in sport and unspecified organizations accounted for the same percentage (15%). By 2014, a 6% drop was witnessed for sport volunteers while the figure for other fields grew impressively to a quarter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easing by 7% and the latter recording an 8% increment. Art was the second m...
^^
Line 13, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fields grew impressively to a quarter.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36868686869 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14172267802 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8983286519 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194219971412 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871108950006 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729103011029 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143718822012 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081742613275 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.