The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.

The pie charts illustrate the information about the percentage of water consumption for three various circumstances (industrial use, agricultural use and domestic use) in six different regions(North America, South America, Europe, Africa Central Asia and South East Asia) of the planet. Overall, most of the countries had been used water for plantation more than the others while less used for household activities.

Furthermore, North America and South America were two regions of America. But, water usage of those two areas was not completely similar. In North America, the major percentage of water consumption was industrial use(48%) and South America it was 10%. But, South America where had been the greatest proportion of water usage for agriculture(71%) and homework usage was 19% while N.America had been mentioned these two were 39% and 13% respectively.

Indeed, The water consumption of Cental Asia for agriculture had been exceeded other five areas so it was 88% while Europe won the first place of vital usage of water for industrial use among the others. However, water consumption of Africa, Central Asia and Southeast Asia were approximately similar because In these three areas, The major proportion of water used for plantation.

To sum up, The amount of water consumption for various purposes have been many differences between the six areas.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'America' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'Americas'.
Suggestion: Americas
...estic use in six different regionsNorth America, South America, Europe, Africa Central ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: America
...e71% and homework usage was 19% while N.America had been mentioned these two were 39% a...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36448598131 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83235011601 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514018691589 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4713806419 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.555555556 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287993330775 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136222046967 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080540717088 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204666051225 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807084157694 0.0819641961636 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.