The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 200 and 2010.
The given tow pie charts provieds information about the proposition of british students at one university in england who were able to speak other language in addition to english , in the year 2000 and 2010. we can observe that spanish language have occupied majority of of space in the year 2000 according to pie chart and it increased its parth in the year 2010
In the year 2000 german and two other language had shared the least position with the percentage of 10 . Last but one position had occupied by french and another language with 15 percent. No other language had stud in second place with 20 percent and the majority of the students know spanish a lot .so spanish had got first with 30 percent
In the year 2010 the total sslcenario had changed. spanish had continued the same position but dramitical it has increased its peecentage with 35. Anyother language stands in second place with 20 percent . people know german laguage had increased ,so german language stude in 3rd position by maintaining 15 percent and at last no other language,french and two other language has droped to last position with 10 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ak other language in addition to english , in the year 2000 and 2010. we can obser...
^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...to english , in the year 2000 and 2010. we can observe that spanish language have ...
^^
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...spanish language have occupied majority of of space in the year 2000 according to pie...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...least position with the percentage of 10 . Last but one position had occupied by f...
^^
Line 2, column 299, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ority of the students know spanish a lot .so spanish had got first with 30 percent...
^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Spanish
... 2010 the total sslcenario had changed. spanish had continued the same position but dra...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e stands in second place with 20 percent . people know german laguage had increase...
^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...tands in second place with 20 percent . people know german laguage had increased ,so g...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...people know german laguage had increased ,so german language stude in 3rd position...
^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , french
...15 percent and at last no other language,french and two other language has droped to la...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80927835052 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55589679283 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494845360825 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.4602488647 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232496317699 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128237941474 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168014762171 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185355593632 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1396187688 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.